yes. I agree that the "bucket" approach is a good idea where you might end up with say 8 of them and then can choose which ones to include for which proposal.
most of my colleagues say it takes 4 or 5 hours to make a new format version from old versions / CV.
the hardest part is reconceptualizing your work into different categories of scientific contributions, whether they are methodological (e.g. clinical trials planning and monitoring, statistical method a) or applied (disease/condition, population x, study design y).
you are also asked to explain the main findings, why those are important, etc. I have used number of times papers were cited as evidence of the importance of the contribution. I've seen others where they refer to the work impacting news / lay press as evidence of importance of the contribution.
hth
------------------------------
Stuart Gansky, DrPH (biostatistics)
John C. Greene Professor of Primary Care Dentistry
University of California, San Francisco
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 05-20-2015 15:25
From: Vicki Hertzberg
Subject: New NIH biosketch
I've done one, and I have to prepare another one for a proposal due in a couple of weeks. My strategy is to create several "buckets" of publications, and use those most suited to the proposal. For instance, I've prepared four buckets that I used for proposal A above, I'll probably re-use two of those and create 2 more for proposal B, and whenever proposal C comes around I'll probably re-use some from proposals A and B and create something new for proposal C.
A word of caution: start early. I might be extraordinarily slow, but it did take me the better part of 2 days to complete this.
Vicki Stover Hertzberg, Ph.D., FASA, P.Stat.
Associate Professor of Nursing
Associate Professor of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
Associate Professor of Mathematics and Computer Science
Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing
Emory University
Atlanta, GA 30322
Office: 404-727-1881