It has long concerned me that when using statistical software, if the user does not understand the principles involved, they may misuse such software and certainly won't do anything innovative. In a very simple but frequently occurring case, online sample size calculators are apparently routinely misused when people do not know that there are assumptions which do not match their application. I have seen that happen. So with the AI revolution, we may see something analogous to H.G. Wells' Time Machine, where in the future, no one knows how to do anything but push a button, and if it fails, they are helpless. Sure a few software developers would be around for some time, but the Statisticians could be long gone. Innovation is important. Understanding is important. If we lose that with AI as a crutch to avoid thinking, rather than using AI as an aid, the future might look as bleak as one Wells imagined.
There have been various efforts noted on ASA Connect to encourage proper use of AI. However, AI will certainly take on more of a life of its own.
------------------------------
James Knaub (Jim)
Retired Lead Mathematical Statistician
------------------------------