View Only

Addressing Reproducible Research: How the Statistical Community Can Help (and Has Been Helping)

By Ronald Wasserstein posted 11-27-2017 14:49

  

(updated 11-29-2017)
The ASA was recently asked how it is addressing reproducible research. Responding to the inquiry provided a useful exercise to evaluate what we had done and what we should be doing. We are sharing our thoughts here to ask what we might have missed and to ask for input on what we should be doing. Please share your comments with me through email or in the comments space below.

While JASA has established publication standards to  improve research quality and reproducibility and Amstat News published a column by Keith A. Baggerly and Donald A. Berry making the case that journals have a key role to play in making research reproducible, the ASA efforts have been more focused on how more statistical awareness and engagement of statisticians will improve reproducibility across the scientific disciplines. In other words, statistics makes the science better, as we like to say.

We know members of the statistical community have been very active in reproducible research with a goal to improve science. We knew we couldn’t begin to list the extensive work by you but we invite you to also share your work in the comments section of this blog entry.

Here are some of the actions the ASA has been doing to help improve the practice of statistics and thereby improve reproducibility:

We were also really pleased to see the National Academies Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics hos its 2015 workshop, Statistical Challenges in Assessing and Fostering the Reproducibility of Scientific Results. And of course we were gratified by the involvement of statisticians in this 2017 NSF workshops

I look forward to your thoughts.

Ron

0 comments
400 views

Permalink