ASA Connect

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

David - I'm wondering if you may be confusing the actual 2020 census with the development of 2020 population estimates based on the 2010 census updated with birth/death and immigration records?  The previous administration did try to interfere with the census--by trying to speed up the count even though (because of delays caused by COVID) this would not allow enough time for the Census Bureau to review and edit the data and by ordering the Census Bureau to produce counts of undocumented immigrants. These efforts were challenged in court and were not successful. The current administration explicitly reversed the order to produce undocumented estimates (as well as estimates of citizen voting-age population).  

Neither the previous nor the current administration interfered with  the production of the population estimates, which are produced on a regular schedule by the Census Bureau's Population Division following long-established procedures. The differences between the population estimates for 2020 and the actual 2020 apportionment counts for states occur in every census.  They may indicate quality problems in either the estimates and/or the census for particular states, which evaluation studies may be able to identify, but there was no "fiddling" of the estimates or the counts.  It is important for everyone to be clear on this point and not to leave any impression that the dedicated staff at the Census Bureau did anything other than their usual highly professional jobs.

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

David - I'm wondering if you may be confusing the actual 2020 census with the development of 2020 population estimates based on the 2010 census updated with birth/death and immigration records?  The previous administration did try to interfere with the census--by trying to speed up the count even though (because of delays caused by COVID) this would not allow enough time for the Census Bureau to review and edit the data and by ordering the Census Bureau to produce counts of undocumented immigrants. These efforts were challenged in court and were not successful. The current administration explicitly reversed the order to produce undocumented estimates (as well as estimates of citizen voting-age population).  

Neither the previous nor the current administration interfered with  the production of the population estimates, which are produced on a regular schedule by the Census Bureau's Population Division following long-established procedures. The differences between the population estimates for 2020 and the actual 2020 apportionment counts for states occur in every census.  They may indicate quality problems in either the estimates and/or the census for particular states, which evaluation studies may be able to identify, but there was no "fiddling" of the estimates or the counts.  It is important for everyone to be clear on this point and not to leave any impression that the dedicated staff at the Census Bureau did anything other than their usual highly professional jobs.

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

David - I'm wondering if you may be confusing the actual 2020 census with the development of 2020 population estimates based on the 2010 census updated with birth/death and immigration records?  The previous administration did try to interfere with the census--by trying to speed up the count even though (because of delays caused by COVID) this would not allow enough time for the Census Bureau to review and edit the data and by ordering the Census Bureau to produce counts of undocumented immigrants. These efforts were challenged in court and were not successful. The current administration explicitly reversed the order to produce undocumented estimates (as well as estimates of citizen voting-age population).  

Neither the previous nor the current administration interfered with  the production of the population estimates, which are produced on a regular schedule by the Census Bureau's Population Division following long-established procedures. The differences between the population estimates for 2020 and the actual 2020 apportionment counts for states occur in every census.  They may indicate quality problems in either the estimates and/or the census for particular states, which evaluation studies may be able to identify, but there was no "fiddling" of the estimates or the counts.  It is important for everyone to be clear on this point and not to leave any impression that the dedicated staff at the Census Bureau did anything other than their usual highly professional jobs.

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

It's really quite simple. The first estimates were rigged by the former administration, which made no secret of doing so. This deliberate malfeasance was caught and corrected by the new administration. The final numbers differ from the early estimates because the early estimates were frauds. 

Are you by any chance familiar with the term DARVO? Once little known outside the area of sexual abuse - I first learned it in connection with research on the under-reporting of human trafficking - Mr Trump and his affiliates have made it go mainstream. It describes a three-step process: 

1. Deny: refuse to accept responsibility for the crime - for example, claiming the proposed citizenship question was intended to protect voting rights when the real intent was to cause an undercount
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census?

   U.S.		remove preview
   What's the big deal about adding a citizenship question to U.S. Census? U.S. President Donald Trump is making a last-ditch push to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. Census, despite a Supreme Court ruling against it last month and criticism by some states and civil liberties groups that the question is meant to deter immigrants from... View this on U.S. >

2. Attack: in this case, the Fox News article cited above, attacks the integrity of the Census final count when, in fact, it is correct and the earlier estimates deliberately incorrect.  
3. Reverse Victim Order: the true perpetrator of the abuse claims to be the victim. the former administration's proxies today claim to have lost representation when the truth is they were prevented from stealing over-representation.
   https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/nation/house-republicans-question-whether-white-house-interfered-in-2020-census-data/article_4b53d691-3f64-5e52-a171-8b8511d93081.html
   
   The DARVO process is standard operating procedure for Mr. Trump and his acolytes. They are now attacking the Census and playing the victim because their tampering was caught and the counts corrected.
   
   

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures

Anyone have any specific census knowledge of the issue identified in this article? All the changes go one way, so random error doesn't seem like a likely explanation.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-biden-census-numbers-estimates-departures