At noon today, I again listened to Gov. Cuomo's daily report on Covid-19. He presented an interesting statistical chart where NYC infection rates went down, in six weeks, from 24% to 2%. As a professional statistician I believe that these NYC statistics are not comparable, as the samples on which they were based are different.
Six weeks ago, at the height of the NYC Covid-19 crisis, and with a low testing capability, the testing took place at the hospitals where sick patients arrived, and at testing sites where doctors sent patients that reported synthomps. Currently, Covid-19 has subsided in NYC and testing capacity has grown. Thence, more random testing is now taking place.
It is natural, even without any real change in Covid-19 infection rates, that the former results (in hospitals) were larger, and the latter (random) are smaller (estimation of NYC Covid-19 prevalence). This is a technical issue, that will naturally escape the non-initiated. The ASA, and statisticians, can contribute by providing guidance and advise to the government in this technical area.
This posting is, by no means, intended to be a criticism of the NY Governor or his team, which we believe have stated the above results in good faith. It is intended to provide yet another argument that (1) authorities need to seek technical stats guidance from professionals, and (2) that the ASA has an important role to play, by way of providing such guidance and help to these.
Thanks/jorge.
------------------------------
Jorge L. Romeu
Emeritus SUNY Faculty
Adjunct Professor, Syracuse U.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jorge_Romeu------------------------------