Blog Viewer

SSPA Blog: Bad Graphs

  

This post is not really about programming, but visually displaying quantitative information. Here’s a grand example of what not to do when you create a graph. The Wall Street Journal created a graph that shows the income distribution of Americans.

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704621304576267113524583554.html

 

The Journal image looks like a histogram with a Gaussian shape; it shows income levels on the x-axis, and amount of taxable income on the y-axis. At first glance, it looks like those in the middle class have the most taxable income. The bars in the middle of the x-axis are highest and the bars are small at either end (the very poor or very rich).

 

However, a second glance reveals that although the bars are physically the same width, they represent vastly different income groupings. The first few bars are:

                1-5 Thousand
                5-10 Thousand
                10-15 Thousand

So far, so good: same width, same income span. But then, the bars stay the same width physically, but the income widths accelerate:

                75-100 Thousand
                100-200 Thousand
                200-500 Thousand

The last three bars kick it up a notch:

                2-5 Million
                5-10 Million
                10+ Million

 

Brendan Nyhan shows how to vary the income groupings  to tell whatever story you want to tell!

 

http://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/2011/05/the-use-and-abuse-of-bar-graphs.html

 

 

And here's another writer's take on the graph:

http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/05/fun-charts-making-rich-look-poor

I’m fascinated (and appalled!) that this sort of “junk chart” still gets published and widely distributed!

-- Mike Carniello

0 comments
46 views

Permalink

Tag