On May 11, 2017, the ASA presented a webinar, Creating Statistical Graphics for Clinical Trial Outcomes Using SAS, presented by Warren Kuhfeld of SAS Institute and nobody complained, even though SAS is a very expensive commercial product. So why does promotion of a product that you can download and use for free causing such grief?
It's the nature of our work that we are heavily dependent on software companies to provide the tools that we need to do our jobs. And I'm willing to pay good money to learn about these tools. Back when I was a heavy SAS user, I even got my boss to spring for expensive trips to the SAS Users Group meetings (though she balked at the Hawaii meeting one year for reasons I still can't understand).
If we limit webinars only to fuzzy headed academic types like me, we lose a lot. As long as any commercial ties are clearly disclosed, no one is deceived.
So, for the record, and I suspect that I am speaking for many others in ASA, I am grateful to the ASA for setting up these opportunities to meet and learn from software experts at SAS, Revolution Analytics, RStudio, Cytel, Biostat Inc., and other companies as well. I'll complain maybe when ASA offers a webinar from Microsoft about how to do advanced statistical analyses in Microsoft Excel.
------------------------------
Stephen Simon, blog.pmean.com
Independent Statistical Consultant
P. Mean Consulting
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-08-2017 09:00
From: Samuel Gardner
Subject: Webinar: Shiny 101: From Nothing to Deployed
I wondering why I should pay to watch a webinar given about a commercial product, being presented by a sales/marketing professional from the commercial product company. I think Shiny is pretty cool, but I don't see the reason for the ASA to charge a fee for this.
------------------------------
Samuel Gardner
Sr Research Scientist
Elanco
------------------------------