ASA Connect

I can only speak for Germany, where I live. You have misunderstood the situation: the 70% was never meant as a strategy - nobody wants to get it over with by infecting 70% of the population quickly. It's a prediction for the long run, because experts no longer expect it to be possible to eliminate the virus. However, strong efforts are now made to slow done growth rates - most provinces have ordered schools and universities to close for the next few weeks (at least), the capital (where I live) has closed much of its public life just now including pubs, gyms, or church service, for example. People in the entire country have been asked ot avoid unnecessary personal contact. Unfortunately, not everybody has embraced the necessity of those measures yet, which means that there are still people who lack the awareness that social distancing is urgently required for protecting the vulnerable members of the population. The article shared by Tim Hesterberg in the other post can certainly help to convince people with an affinity for science.

Besides trying to slow down the epidemic, hospitals have cancelled projectable surgery in order to free capacity for the expected severe corona cases. We can only hope that the measures do not come too late, and that situations as bad as in northern Italy can be avoided.

I can only speak for Germany, where I live. You have misunderstood the situation: the 70% was never meant as a strategy - nobody wants to get it over with by infecting 70% of the population quickly. It's a prediction for the long run, because experts no longer expect it to be possible to eliminate the virus. However, strong efforts are now made to slow done growth rates - most provinces have ordered schools and universities to close for the next few weeks (at least), the capital (where I live) has closed much of its public life just now including pubs, gyms, or church service, for example. People in the entire country have been asked ot avoid unnecessary personal contact. Unfortunately, not everybody has embraced the necessity of those measures yet, which means that there are still people who lack the awareness that social distancing is urgently required for protecting the vulnerable members of the population. The article shared by Tim Hesterberg in the other post can certainly help to convince people with an affinity for science.

Besides trying to slow down the epidemic, hospitals have cancelled projectable surgery in order to free capacity for the expected severe corona cases. We can only hope that the measures do not come too late, and that situations as bad as in northern Italy can be avoided.

I can only speak for Germany, where I live. You have misunderstood the situation: the 70% was never meant as a strategy - nobody wants to get it over with by infecting 70% of the population quickly. It's a prediction for the long run, because experts no longer expect it to be possible to eliminate the virus. However, strong efforts are now made to slow done growth rates - most provinces have ordered schools and universities to close for the next few weeks (at least), the capital (where I live) has closed much of its public life just now including pubs, gyms, or church service, for example. People in the entire country have been asked ot avoid unnecessary personal contact. Unfortunately, not everybody has embraced the necessity of those measures yet, which means that there are still people who lack the awareness that social distancing is urgently required for protecting the vulnerable members of the population. The article shared by Tim Hesterberg in the other post can certainly help to convince people with an affinity for science.

Besides trying to slow down the epidemic, hospitals have cancelled projectable surgery in order to free capacity for the expected severe corona cases. We can only hope that the measures do not come too late, and that situations as bad as in northern Italy can be avoided.

I can only speak for Germany, where I live. You have misunderstood the situation: the 70% was never meant as a strategy - nobody wants to get it over with by infecting 70% of the population quickly. It's a prediction for the long run, because experts no longer expect it to be possible to eliminate the virus. However, strong efforts are now made to slow done growth rates - most provinces have ordered schools and universities to close for the next few weeks (at least), the capital (where I live) has closed much of its public life just now including pubs, gyms, or church service, for example. People in the entire country have been asked ot avoid unnecessary personal contact. Unfortunately, not everybody has embraced the necessity of those measures yet, which means that there are still people who lack the awareness that social distancing is urgently required for protecting the vulnerable members of the population. The article shared by Tim Hesterberg in the other post can certainly help to convince people with an affinity for science.

Besides trying to slow down the epidemic, hospitals have cancelled projectable surgery in order to free capacity for the expected severe corona cases. We can only hope that the measures do not come too late, and that situations as bad as in northern Italy can be avoided.

I can only speak for Germany, where I live. You have misunderstood the situation: the 70% was never meant as a strategy - nobody wants to get it over with by infecting 70% of the population quickly. It's a prediction for the long run, because experts no longer expect it to be possible to eliminate the virus. However, strong efforts are now made to slow done growth rates - most provinces have ordered schools and universities to close for the next few weeks (at least), the capital (where I live) has closed much of its public life just now including pubs, gyms, or church service, for example. People in the entire country have been asked ot avoid unnecessary personal contact. Unfortunately, not everybody has embraced the necessity of those measures yet, which means that there are still people who lack the awareness that social distancing is urgently required for protecting the vulnerable members of the population. The article shared by Tim Hesterberg in the other post can certainly help to convince people with an affinity for science.

Besides trying to slow down the epidemic, hospitals have cancelled projectable surgery in order to free capacity for the expected severe corona cases. We can only hope that the measures do not come too late, and that situations as bad as in northern Italy can be avoided.

I can only speak for Germany, where I live. You have misunderstood the situation: the 70% was never meant as a strategy - nobody wants to get it over with by infecting 70% of the population quickly. It's a prediction for the long run, because experts no longer expect it to be possible to eliminate the virus. However, strong efforts are now made to slow done growth rates - most provinces have ordered schools and universities to close for the next few weeks (at least), the capital (where I live) has closed much of its public life just now including pubs, gyms, or church service, for example. People in the entire country have been asked ot avoid unnecessary personal contact. Unfortunately, not everybody has embraced the necessity of those measures yet, which means that there are still people who lack the awareness that social distancing is urgently required for protecting the vulnerable members of the population. The article shared by Tim Hesterberg in the other post can certainly help to convince people with an affinity for science.

Besides trying to slow down the epidemic, hospitals have cancelled projectable surgery in order to free capacity for the expected severe corona cases. We can only hope that the measures do not come too late, and that situations as bad as in northern Italy can be avoided.